Would you consider Josh Gordon (for the Eagles)

bkeich 2017-03-01 15:38:44 UTC #1

So, Josh Gordon will probably be re-instated and we desperately need a quality WR (or 3). Would you approach his agent about a "show me" contract, say 1 yr, $5M.

Keep in mind his horrible substance abuse history, but also I don't think there is any violence in his history, just unable to stop using drugs. He is supremely talented and his business manager now states that he actually lives in his house.

Honestly, there isnt much to lose but salary cap space. I would give it a shot.

Yes, I would try and sign him or trade for him
No, I would not try and sign him

0voters

Votes are public.

Show results

bkeich 2017-03-01 21:19:57 UTC #2

So far the results are 5 NO, 2 Yes (myself being one of those). Normally, I think I would be one of the first to say to stay away from him because of his repeat problems, there is just something about this guy that strikes me as "going to turn it around". He has had multiple arrests and suspensions for alcohol and marijuana, but he has never had any indication of violence or any other crimes (that is actually pretty unusual for guys with his history).

He would fit a HUGE need. I think we have a ton of high character guys on this team (not the least of which are Wentz, Ertz, Jenkins, Cox, etc.) and a rarity, a WR who isnt crazy (Matthews). I think the structure for this guy to find himself is there if he is willing, and reports (albeit from his agent / manager) are that he is currently trying to change his life.

I think a 1-year, "show me" contract would be perfect. Gordon needs it and the Eagles certainly could use his help (and the cap savings from having to go after a premium FA would really help).

jimbomill 2017-03-02 01:54:30 UTC #3

Being a little desperate for talent, I'd roll the dice.

phillychuck 2017-03-02 02:02:07 UTC #4

No. Availability is the most important ability, and there's no way to project Gordon's availability.

allentown 2017-03-02 02:18:15 UTC #5

That's my concern. Cap space is limited. If you use a significant chunk on him and he's later suspended for the season, then that is a big, big hole in the team and the cap space can really only be used to extend a player, but not to help 2017-18. Also, I'd rather get a WR, in draft or FA, who can be with Wentz for years.