The team and the bats have been doing better recently, but the feast or famine inconsistency continues.
Let's check on the claim of us beating up on bad pitching/teams and struggling against good pitching/teams.
In the NL, we have the following record breakdown:
SDP: 6-0 (2nd in the NL West)
PIT: 3-0 (4th in the NL Central)
SFG: 4-2 (4th in the NL West)
WSH: 5-2 (4th in the NL East
COL: 4-2 (5th in the NL West)
MIA: 5-2 (3rd in the NL East
NYM: 2-1 (5th in the NL East)
Outside of the the Padres who we seem to match up well against, our best records are against pretty bad teams.
ATL: 1-5 (1st in the NL East)
LAD: 1-2 (1st in the NL West)
CHC: 1-6 (2nd in the NL Central)
MIL: 1-2 (1st in the NL Central)
AZ: 1-2 (3rd in the NL West)
CIN: 1-2 (5th in the NL Central)
Whereas against the better NL teams, we have our worst records so far. Why we lost series to AZ and CIncy, I'm not sure since they are not very good, but timing plays a role too.
Against the AL, we've been able to win every series except CLE and TEX where we lost 2 of 3. TEX was the first series to start the season and we definitely started slow. CLE was a better test and we scored a total of 5 runs in 3 games. Their pitching did lock us down.
We'll see how the rest of the season plays out, but there does appear to be some credence to the claim that we tend to get most of our wins against bad/mediocre pitching/teams and have, at least so far, not proven we can hang with the teams we will likely need to beat to get to a WS and win it.