Is this similar to the international soccer market from the non-MLB point of view?
In the international soccer market small domestic clubs sign a lot of young players and develop talent in order to sell the best player's contracts to big clubs, and those sales fund the program to invest in more young players, without any accusations of corruption. many of the young players will not pan out but the ones that do are big wins for the clubs and cover the costs of the kids that didn't develop. It is a more inclusive model than the United State's pay to play because it gives kids from lower economic backgrounds the same chances, increasing the pool of players because the payout is on the back end by the rich clubs rather than on the front end by the player's families.
I understand that MLB is different because teams are not buying a contract, but its in MLB's best interest to support the financing of the youth development, right? 50 years ago, maybe not, but now the money is so lopsided it makes sense to me. If MLB leaned into it, there could be better visibility and less fraudulent age representation.