We have changed our drafting influence a bit but I really don't see the dramatic change. Randolph and to some degree Moniak were more disciplined than some of the toolsy kids we have signed in the past, but again some of that is due to our higher draft picks. Moniak SHOULD be more disciplined as well as toolsy at his draft spot. But Senzel would have been the real "most disciplined" choice. Randolph was a bit of a reach for a disciplined player where we drafted him though and I kind of wanted someone with a better defensive profile and more power.
Beyond the first round last year our hitters don't strike me as especially disciplined for their draft spot. Stobbe is a power SS. Martinelli was toolsy. Guys like Hall and Wojo were picked for their power and not their hit tool. Stephen is the one higher offensive guy that may have been a play for a more disciplined HS bat.
Also, whenever we draft an Altherr in the 9th round we are definitely trying to draft the tools and not the discipline. Our trades for guys like Alfaro and Williams lately are certainly not trades for discipline. They are trades for tools. Klentak has not added many position players in trades though I suppose he will go for at least guys with average walk rates. Certainly a Nava fits that profile. Saunders and Kendrick had OK walk rates but were more there for their power and hit tools respectively.
Just because guys like Anthony Hewitt never became disciplined did not mean we did not try to teach them. And even he was the 24th pick where good hit tools rarely drop to. A couple years later we are pretty happy with the Quinn pick which was a toolsy pick also.