Fangraphs on Stott:
"He's fine at shortstop so long as you're okay with a non-traditional thowing style. Long, low-ball swing turns some scouts off, but hands are electric. Very divisive.
Full Report
Teams fall into one of three groups when evaluating Stott. There are teams that think, despite his size and atypical throwing stroke, that he'll stay at shortstop and hit for some power. Those teams are highest on him. Then there are teams that think he'll just do one of those and, finally, those who think he'll do neither. His swing is geared for low ball contact, and he hits pitches near his shoetops to all fields, with power. But the swing's length and bat path creates doubt that Stott will get to velocity up and/or in. Lefty-hitting shortstops with power are rare, and Stott has a shot to be one, but he's riskier than is typical for a college bat who has two years of strong numbers."
Since they mention 2 years of strong numbers they may not be including this year, where he's made significant progress. I think the Phils' analytics guys are pretty sharp, and probably know Stott's numbers vs. good college pitching (which he faced often enough) and I suspect those numbers are encouraging, somewhat diminishing the concern that he can't handle high or inside fastballs..
Here's a suggested interview question for our redoubtable Philly sports media: "Who were some of the best pitchers you've faced in college and in the amateur circuit, and how successful were you against them?"